The Toxicology, Chemistry, and Regulatory Framework of Manual Dishwashing Detergents: A Comprehensive Safety Assessment
Share
1. Introduction: The Intersection of Chemophobia and Consumer Safety
The modern consumer goods landscape is increasingly characterized by a profound dichotomy between established chemical efficacy and a growing, often digitally amplified, public skepticism regarding synthetic ingredients. This phenomenon, widely characterized by the scientific community as "chemophobia," manifests as an irrational aversion to chemical compounds solely based on their synthetic origin or polysyllabic nomenclature, rather than their toxicological risk profile. In the specific domain of household hygiene, this anxiety has crystallized around manual dishwashing detergents, transforming ubiquitous household staples into subjects of fear and controversy.
Recent viral misinformation campaigns, disseminated primarily through short-form video platforms such as TikTok and Instagram, have targeted market-leading formulations, specifically Dawn Ultra Dishwashing Liquid. These campaigns frequently utilize highly emotive imagery—such as fluorescence microscopy footage depicting "glowing blue cells" allegedly undergoing lysis upon contact with detergent—to propagate the narrative that standard dish soaps are "cocktails of cancer-linked ingredients" capable of disrupting hormonal baselines and inflicting cellular damage. Such content typically conflates cytotoxicity observed in isolated in vitro cell cultures with organism-level toxicity, ignoring the fundamental physiological barriers and metabolic detoxification pathways that protect human health in real-world use scenarios.
The implications of such misinformation extend beyond consumer anxiety; they foster a reliance on "do-it-yourself" (DIY) alternatives that are often chemically inert or, in some instances, deleterious to hygiene standards. To address these claims with the necessary rigor, this report provides an exhaustive scientific analysis of manual dishwashing detergents. It dissects the molecular architecture of anionic and nonionic surfactants, the toxicological profiles of preservatives such as Methylisothiazolinone (MIT), the physics of rinsing dynamics, and the regulatory frameworks governing contaminants like 1,4-dioxane. By synthesizing data from Safety Data Sheets (SDS), peer-reviewed toxicological literature, and regulatory statutes (including New York State’s ECL Article 35), this document aims to dismantle the "Great Soap Panic" through a lens of objective chemical reality.
1.1 The Anatomy of Viral Misinformation
The genesis of the current controversy lies in the misinterpretation of standard toxicological assays. The viral content in question typically relies on the visual shock value of cell death. Surfactants, the active ingredients in dish soap, are defined by their ability to disrupt lipid membranes; this is the precise thermodynamic mechanism by which they solubilize grease on cookware. When applied directly to unprotected epithelial cells in a petri dish—cells that lack the protective stratum corneum of the skin or the mucous barriers of the digestive tract—surfactants will inevitably compromise the cell membrane, leading to lysis and death. Presenting this expected pharmacological action as evidence of "toxicity" represents a fundamental logical fallacy known as the confusion of hazard and risk. While the hazard (membrane disruption) exists in a petri dish, the risk to a human user is mitigated by exposure routes, dosage, and biological defenses.
Furthermore, these narratives often exploit the "naturalistic fallacy," assuming that plant-derived ingredients are inherently benign while synthetic analogues are inherently malevolent. This report counters this narrative by demonstrating that "natural" alternatives often rely on identical chemical functional groups to achieve cleaning efficacy, and that synthetic processing is frequently required to render natural feedstocks safe and effective.
2. The Physicochemistry of Cleaning: Thermodynamics and Micellization
To evaluate the safety of dish soap, one must first comprehend the molecular machinery that dictates its function. Dishwashing liquids are not simple solvents; they are complex colloidal systems designed to manipulate the thermodynamics of oil-water interfaces. The primary agents of this manipulation are surfactants (surface-active agents).
2.1 The Amphiphilic Molecular Architecture
Surfactants are defined by their amphiphilic nature, possessing a dual affinity that allows them to bridge the immiscibility gap between water and lipids. This structure consists of two distinct functional domains:
The Hydrophobic Tail: Typically a long hydrocarbon chain (C_{10}-C_{18}), this portion is non-polar and exhibits a strong affinity for lipids, fats, and oils. In commercial detergents like Dawn, this tail is often derived from petroleum or plant oils (coconut or palm kernel oil).
The Hydrophilic Head: This polar or charged moiety interacts strongly with water molecules via hydrogen bonding or ion-dipole interactions, rendering the entire molecule soluble in an aqueous environment.
This dual nature is not merely a structural feature but a functional imperative. Without the hydrophobic tail, the molecule would not interact with grease; without the hydrophilic head, it would not dissolve in the wash water.
2.2 Thermodynamics of Micelle Formation
The cleaning process is driven by the minimization of free energy in the system. When surfactant molecules are introduced into water, the hydrophobic tails disrupt the hydrogen bonding network of the water molecules, creating an energetically unfavorable state of low entropy. To restore system stability, surfactant molecules initially migrate to the air-water interface, orienting their tails into the air.
However, as the concentration of surfactant increases, the surface becomes saturated. At a specific threshold known as the Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC), the surfactant molecules spontaneously self-assemble into spherical aggregates called micelles.
Micellar Structure: In a micelle, the hydrophobic tails cluster together in the interior, creating a water-free, lipophilic core. The hydrophilic heads form the outer shell, interacting with the bulk water phase.
Solubilization Mechanism: Grease and oil, being hydrophobic, are thermodynamically driven into the lipophilic core of the micelles. This effectively "hides" the grease from the water, allowing it to be suspended in the solution and rinsed away.
The viral claim that soap residues "stick" to dishes fundamentally ignores this thermodynamic drive. The surfactant molecules are energetically favored to remain in the water phase (within micelles) rather than adhering to the solid surface of the dish once the bulk water is introduced during rinsing. The formation of micelles is the mechanism of removal, not deposition.
2.3 Surfactant Classifications in Modern Formulations
Commercial dishwashing liquids utilize a synergistic blend of surfactants to optimize grease removal, foam stability, and skin mildness.
No electrical charge; resistant to hard water ions (Ca^{2+}, Mg^{2+}); lower irritation potential.
Amphoteric
Cocamidopropyl Betaine
Viscosity modification; irritation mitigation.
Charge varies with pH (zwitterionic); reduces the harshness of anionic surfactants.
The "Blue Dawn" formulation, often the subject of scrutiny, relies heavily on a specific anionic surfactant, Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES), due to its exceptional ability to remove heavy lipid deposits—a property that also makes it the agent of choice for wildlife rehabilitation following crude oil spills.
3. Toxicological Assessment: The SLES and 1,4-Dioxane Nexus
The most persistent myth concerning dish soap safety involves the allegation that Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES) is a carcinogen or that it "builds up" in the body. To dismantle this, we must examine the synthesis of SLES and the management of its byproducts.
3.1 The Chemistry of Ethoxylation
SLES is derived from Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) through a process called ethoxylation. SLS itself is a highly effective cleaner but can be irritating to the skin because its small, highly charged head group allows it to penetrate the protein structure of the skin surface.
The Process: To mitigate this irritation, ethylene oxide (C_2H_4O) is inserted into the molecule. This increases the size of the hydrophilic head group, making the molecule larger and more water-soluble, thereby reducing its ability to penetrate the skin barrier and lowering its irritation potential.
The Result: SLES is milder on the hands than SLS, making it preferable for products intended for frequent skin contact, such as manual dishwashing liquids and shampoos.
3.2 The Genesis of 1,4-Dioxane
The "cancer link" cited in viral posts refers not to SLES itself, but to 1,4-dioxane, a byproduct formed during the ethoxylation reaction. When ethylene oxide molecules interact with each other rather than the fatty alcohol substrate, they can dimerize to form 1,4-dioxane (C_4H_8O_2).
Carcinogenicity: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) classify 1,4-dioxane as "likely to be carcinogenic to humans" based on studies where animals were exposed to high concentrations in drinking water over their lifetimes.
The Viral Distortion: Alarmist posts conflate the presence of a contaminant during the raw reaction phase with the content of the final product on the shelf. This ignores the critical manufacturing step of purification.
3.3 Mitigation Technology: Vacuum Stripping
Major chemical manufacturers, including Procter & Gamble (the maker of Dawn), utilize a purification technique known as vacuum stripping or steam stripping to remove 1,4-dioxane from the final SLES raw material.
Mechanism: 1,4-Dioxane has a relatively high vapor pressure compared to the heavy surfactant molecules. By subjecting the raw surfactant to high heat under a vacuum, the volatile 1,4-dioxane is vaporized and removed, while the non-volatile surfactant remains.
Efficacy: This process reduces 1,4-dioxane levels from potentially hundreds of parts per million (ppm) down to trace levels, often below detection limits or within single-digit ppm ranges.
3.4 Regulatory Frameworks and Compliance
The landscape of 1,4-dioxane regulation has shifted dramatically in recent years, rendering older fears obsolete.
New York State ECL Article 35: In a landmark legislative move, New York State enacted Environmental Conservation Law Article 35, which set the strictest limits on 1,4-dioxane in the world. As of December 31, 2023, the limit for household cleansing products is 1 ppm.
The "National Standard" Effect: Because major manufacturers like P&G manage centralized supply chains, they cannot efficiently produce a "New York safe" version and a "toxic" version for the rest of the country. Consequently, the reformulation required to meet New York's 1 ppm limit has been rolled out across the entire North American market.
Verification: Independent testing by environmental advocacy groups, such as the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, confirmed in 2024 that detergents including Tide and Dawn have successfully reduced 1,4-dioxane levels to compliant, trace amounts.
Conclusion on SLES: The SLES found in a bottle of Dawn sitting on a shelf in 2025 is not the same grade of raw material from decades past. It is a highly purified ingredient. The EPA’s 2020 and 2024 risk evaluations concluded that consumer products containing these trace byproducts do not present an unreasonable risk to the general population.
4. Preservative Safety: The Case of Methylisothiazolinone (MIT)
The second target of the viral campaign is Methylisothiazolinone (MIT), a preservative often accused of being a neurotoxin or carcinogen.
4.1 The Necessity of Preservation
Manual dishwashing liquids are aqueous solutions rich in biodegradable surfactants and often botanical extracts. This composition creates an ideal growth medium for bacteria, mold, and yeast. Without robust preservation, a bottle of dish soap would rapidly become contaminated with pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus. MIT prevents this biological spoilage, protecting the consumer from actual infection risks.
4.2 Mechanism of Action
Isothiazolinones function as biocides by interacting with the thiol (-SH) groups of proteins within microbial cells. This interaction disrupts the Krebs cycle (cellular respiration) and inhibits the generation of ATP, effectively starving the bacteria. This mechanism is highly specific to the chemical structure of the preservative and does not imply a mechanism for human carcinogenesis.
4.3 Sensitization vs. Systemic Toxicity
The primary health concern regarding MIT is allergic contact dermatitis, not cancer.
Sensitizer Status: MIT is classified as a skin sensitizer. In the mid-2000s, an "epidemic" of contact allergy was observed when MIT was used in high concentrations in leave-on products (like lotions).
Rinse-Off Safety: However, regulatory bodies distinguish between "leave-on" and "rinse-off" products. In dish soap, the product is diluted in water and rinsed off the skin almost immediately. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel and the EPA have deemed MIT safe for use in rinse-off products at concentrations up to 100 ppm (0.01%).
Carcinogenicity: Extensive testing protocols submitted to the EPA for pesticide registration (since MIT is also used as an antimicrobial) have consistently shown no evidence of carcinogenicity or mutagenicity. The "neurotoxicity" claims are derived from in vitro studies using isolated neurons exposed to massive doses, which does not reflect the dermal exposure route of washing dishes.
Summary: If a consumer is allergic to MIT, they may experience an itchy rash on their hands. This is an allergic reaction, similar to a reaction to peanuts or nickel, and is not indicative of systemic toxicity or cancer. For the non-allergic majority (over 98% of the population), MIT is safe.
5. Residue Analysis: The Physics of Rinsing and Ingestion Risks
A central pillar of the fear-mongering narrative is the assertion that "tiny traces remain on dishes... eventually making their way into our food," implying a cumulative toxic effect. This claim is dismantled by an understanding of fluid dynamics and adsorption isotherms.
5.1 The Hydrodynamics of Rinsing
The rinsing process is governed by the principles of mass transfer. When a dish covered in soapy water is placed under a stream of fresh water, a concentration gradient is established.
Desorption: Surfactant molecules, which are loosely associated with the dish surface via weak Van der Waals forces, are subjected to the shear force of the flowing water. Because the surfactants are highly soluble in water (due to their hydrophilic heads), the partition coefficient heavily favors the aqueous phase over the solid surface.
Dilution: The volume of water used in a typical rinse (several liters) compared to the volume of residual surfactant film (microliters) results in a dilution factor of several orders of magnitude.
5.2 Quantitative Residue Studies
Scientific investigations into surfactant residues on hard surfaces (ceramics, glass, stainless steel) generally find that residues are negligible after rinsing.
Detection Limits: While highly sensitive analytical techniques (like mass spectrometry) might detect nanogram-level traces, these quantities are biologically irrelevant.
Oral Toxicity: Even if a consumer were to ingest the trace residues left on a plate, the toxicity of commercial dish soap is extremely low. The acute oral LD50 (lethal dose for 50% of the population) for ingredients like SLES is typically in the range of grams per kilogram of body weight. One would essentially have to drink the bottle directly to approach toxic thresholds. The SDS for Dawn advises simply drinking water if the product is ingested, reflecting its low toxicity.
5.3 The "Gut Health" Confusion: Hand Soap vs. Rinse Aids
Much of the recent anxiety regarding "gut health" and "leaky gut" stems from the misinterpretation of a specific 2023 study published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
The Study: Researchers found that alcohol ethoxylates in commercial dishwasher rinse aids could damage the epithelial barrier of the gut in vitro.
The Context: The study focused on industrial/professional dishwashers (like those in restaurants) which often skip a final fresh-water rinse to save time, relying on the rinse aid to dry the dishes quickly. This results in higher residue levels.
The Error: Viral posts extrapolated these findings to manual dish soap (like Dawn) and home dishwashers. However, manual washing involves active rinsing, and home machines have dedicated rinse cycles with fresh water. Furthermore, the chemical composition of a rinse aid (designed to break water tension for drying) is distinct from hand dish soap (designed to emulsify grease).
6. The "DIY" Alternative: A Chemical Analysis of Failure
In response to perceived chemical dangers, viral posts frequently recommend homemade alternatives, most notably the combination of baking soda and vinegar. This recommendation betrays a profound ignorance of basic stoichiometry.
6.1 The Neutralization Reaction
Baking soda (Sodium Bicarbonate, NaHCO_3) is a base with a pH of approximately 9. Vinegar (Acetic Acid, CH_3COOH) is a weak acid with a pH of approximately 2-3. When mixed, they undergo a rapid acid-base neutralization reaction:
The "Volcano": The visible fizzing is the release of carbon dioxide gas. This creates mechanical agitation for a few seconds, which can be satisfying to watch, but it is chemically fleeting.
The Resulting Solution: Once the bubbling stops, the remaining liquid is a solution of water and sodium acetate (CH_3COONa). Sodium acetate is a salt used in heating pads and as a food flavoring (salt and vinegar chips). It has zero surfactant properties. It lacks the hydrophobic tail necessary to sequester grease into micelles. Washing dishes with this mixture is chemically equivalent to washing them in salty water.
6.2 The "Unsaponification" Disaster
Some DIY recipes suggest mixing vinegar with Castile soap (a true soap made from saponified vegetable oils). This is even more detrimental than the baking soda mixture.
Saponification: Soap is made by reacting fatty acids with a strong base (lye), creating a fatty acid salt (R-COO^-Na^+). This salt form is water-soluble and cleans effectively.
Acid Hydrolysis: When an acid like vinegar is added to Castile soap, it protonates the carboxylate head group:
The Mess: This reaction converts the water-soluble soap back into insoluble free fatty acids (R-COOH). These fatty acids precipitate out of the solution as an oily, waxy curd. Instead of cleaning the dishes, this mixture actively coats them in a layer of grease and oil.
Verdict: The "natural" combination of vinegar and soap destroys the cleaning capability of the soap. These ingredients must be used separately to be effective (e.g., soap to wash, vinegar to descale hard water deposits), never mixed.
7. Comparative Analysis of Alternative Formulations
While the safety of standard detergents like Dawn is supported by data, some consumers may still prefer to avoid petroleum-derived ingredients or specific preservatives for ethical or dermatological reasons. The market offers several "green" alternatives that, unlike the DIY vinegar mixtures, utilize valid surfactant chemistry.
The following analysis compares the chemical strategies of three leading alternative brands against the standard formulation.
Table 1: Chemical Formulation Strategy Comparison
Feature
Dawn Ultra (Standard)
Seventh Generation (Free & Clear)
Better Life (Dish Soap)
Ecover (Zero)
Primary Surfactant
SLES (Petroleum/Plant hybrid)
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (Plant-derived)
Alkyl Polyglucosides & Soap Bark
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate & Glucosides
Cleaning Mechanism
Anionic Micelle Formation (High Foam)
Anionic Micelle Formation
Nonionic/Saponin Emulsification
Anionic/Nonionic Hybrid
Preservative
Methylisothiazolinone (MIT)
Methylisothiazolinone (MIT) & Benzisothiazolinone
Methylisothiazolinone (MIT)*
None listed (Ethanol/pH control)
1,4-Dioxane Risk
Trace (Vacuum Stripped)
None (Non-ethoxylated SLS)
None (Glucoside based)
None (Non-ethoxylated)
Dye/Fragrance
Synthetic (Blue/Green)
None
None
None
pH Strategy
Neutral to Alkaline
Neutral
Neutral
Acidic/Neutral balance
*Note: Formulations change frequently. Consumers avoiding MIT must check specific batch labels.
7.1 Seventh Generation Dish Liquid (Free & Clear)
Surfactant Choice: This brand replaces the ethoxylated SLES with Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) derived from coconut or palm oil. Because SLS is not ethoxylated, there is zero risk of 1,4-dioxane creation, eliminating the need for vacuum stripping.
Formulation Challenge: SLS is more irritating to the skin than SLES. To counter this, Seventh Generation incorporates Lauramine Oxide and Glycerin. Lauramine oxide is an amine oxide surfactant that boosts foam and stabilizes the formula, while glycerin acts as a humectant to protect the user's hands.
Preservation: Notably, this brand often uses MIT and Benzisothiazolinone for preservation. This indicates that even "natural" brands recognize the necessity of potent biocides to prevent pathogen growth. Consumers allergic to MIT will not find relief with this specific product, despite its "natural" label.
7.2 Better Life Dish Soap
Innovation: Better Life employs a completely sulfate-free approach, relying on Alkyl Polyglucosides (APGs) like decyl glucoside. APGs are nonionic surfactants synthesized from corn sugars and fatty alcohols. They are exceptionally mild and biodegradable.
Saponins: Uniquely, this formula includes Soap Bark Extract (Quillaja saponaria). This plant extract contains natural saponins—molecules that foam like soap. This allows the product to generate suds without synthetic sulfates, bridging the psychological gap for consumers who equate foam with cleaning power.
Performance: Nonionic surfactants are generally less sensitive to hard water than anionics, making this a robust choice for households with mineral-rich water.
7.3 Ecover Zero Dish Soap
The "Zero" Philosophy: Ecover Zero is explicitly formulated for extreme skin sensitivity. It avoids fragrances and dyes entirely.
Preservative Strategy: Unlike Seventh Generation and Better Life (which often use MIT), Ecover Zero formulations typically rely on ethanol and lactic acid for preservation stability.
Chemical Implication: By adjusting the pH and using alcohol, they create an environment hostile to bacteria without using isothiazolinones. This makes Ecover Zero the scientifically superior choice for individuals with diagnosed contact dermatitis or isothiazolinone allergies.
8. Regulatory and Environmental Future Outlook
The landscape of household detergents is currently being reshaped by a convergence of green chemistry innovation and stringent state-level regulation.
8.1 The "California Effect" and Regulatory Harmonization
Regulations in large markets like California and New York exert a gravitational pull on the entire industry. The implementation of New York's 1 ppm limit on 1,4-dioxane has effectively eradicated high levels of this contaminant from the North American supply chain. Manufacturers have invested heavily in stripping technologies and alternative surfactant syntheses (like direct glucosidation) to ensure compliance. This means that the safety margin for consumers is wider today than at any point in history.
8.2 Biodegradability and Aquatic Toxicity
Beyond human safety, the focus is shifting to environmental impact. All surfactants discussed—SLES, SLS, and APGs—are readily biodegradable under aerobic conditions. However, the shift toward APGs (as seen in Better Life) represents a move toward "carbon neutrality," as the head groups are derived from renewable agricultural sugars rather than petrochemicals. This reduces the "embedded carbon" of the product, aligning consumer hygiene with climate goals.
9. Conclusion
The "Great Soap Panic" serves as a potent case study in the sociology of scientific misinformation. The viral imagery of "glowing blue cells" relies on a fundamental misrepresentation of surfactant thermodynamics: the very property that allows soap to destroy the lipid membranes of bacteria and grease on a plate (cytotoxicity) is precisely what makes it an effective cleaner. This property, however, does not translate to human toxicity during the transient, diluted exposure of dishwashing.
Key Findings:
SLES Safety: Sodium Laureth Sulfate is a safe, effective surfactant. The historic concern regarding 1,4-dioxane has been addressed through advanced vacuum stripping technologies and strict regulatory enforcement (NY ECL 35), reducing contaminants to negligible trace levels (<1 ppm).
MIT Reality: Methylisothiazolinone is a necessary preservative that prevents bacterial growth. It is a known skin sensitizer for a small fraction of the population but possesses no carcinogenic activity.
DIY Failure: The combination of baking soda and vinegar is chemically inert for cleaning purposes, producing a saline solution with no grease-cutting power. Mixing vinegar with castile soap is actively counterproductive, creating oily precipitates.
Residue Myths: The physics of rinsing ensures that surfactant residues on dishes are minimal and biologically insignificant. Claims of "gut barrier damage" from hand soap are based on misinterpretations of data related to industrial rinse aids.
Recommendation: For the general consumer, standard dish detergents like Dawn Ultra offer a safe and highly effective hygiene solution. The risk of toxicity is negligible. However, for individuals with specific sensitivities to isothiazolinone preservatives or those seeking to minimize petroleum usage, Better Life (for sulfate-free cleaning) and Ecover Zero (for preservative sensitivity) represent scientifically valid alternatives. Consumers are advised to rely on Safety Data Sheets and regulatory consensus rather than decontextualized social media content when making household safety decisions.
Reference Data Summary
Dawn SDS:
1,4-Dioxane Regulation:
MIT Safety:
Surfactant Chemistry:
DIY Chemistry:
Alternative Formulations:
Works cited
1. 'Turns out I've been washing dishes with hand soap my entire life.' – Consumer Shows That Dawn Antibacterial Dishwashing Liquid Is Actually Hand Soap - TwistedSifter, https://twistedsifter.com/2024/10/turns-out-ive-been-washing-dishes-with-hand-soap-my-entire-life-consumer-shows-that-dawn-antibacterial-dishwashing-liquid-is-actually-hand-soap/ 2. Understanding Surfactants: The Science Behind Soaps and Detergents, https://www.moleaer.com/blog/wastewater-treatment/understanding-surfactants-the-science-behind-soaps-and-detergents 3. How Does Soap Work? The Science Behind Cleaning, https://tkcleaningservices.com/how-does-soap-work/ 4. Science vs. Sensation – Dishwasher Detergent Safety, https://cris.msu.edu/news/featured/science-vs-sensation-dishwasher-detergent-safety/ 5. Glucopon® Alkyl Polyglucoside - A Surfactant that Cares - Care 360° Portal, https://care360.basf.com/northamerica/en/industries/home-care-and-I-I/insights/glucopon-alkyl-polyglucoside---a-surfactant-that-cares 6. The Chemistry of Cleaning | The American Cleaning Institute (ACI), https://www.cleaninginstitute.org/understanding-products/science-soap/chemistry-cleaning 7. How soap works? - Biolin Scientific, https://www.biolinscientific.com/blog/how-soap-works 8. Performance and Efficiency of Anionic Dishwashing Liquids with Amphoteric and Nonionic Surfactants - Sci-Hub, https://2024.sci-hub.ru/4930/9a5b8a641caec5bbdcd4ebe28a780e47/10.1007@s11743-015-1784-5.pdf 9. 97591966_RET_NG - Dawn Ultra Dishwashing Liquid, Lemon Scent - SAFETY DATA SHEET, https://www.physics.purdue.edu/primelab/safety/MSDS/SDS/Dawn%20Ultra%20Dishwashing%20Liquid.pdf 10. Personal Care and Cleaning Products Containing 1,4-Dioxane Profile, https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2024/05/14-Dioxane_Profile_Accessible_Version.pdf 11. 1,4-Dioxane in Cosmetics: A Manufacturing Byproduct - FDA, https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/potential-contaminants-cosmetics/14-dioxane-cosmetics-manufacturing-byproduct 12. 1,4-Dioxane Control for P&G's Consumer Products - Regulations.gov, https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0723-0008/attachment_2.pdf 13. EPA Finalizes Solvent 1,4-Dioxane TSCA Risk Evaluation, https://www.epa.gov/chemicals-under-tsca/epa-finalizes-solvent-14-dioxane-tsca-risk-evaluation 14. 6. Remediation and Treatment Technologies - ITRC 1,4-Dioxane, https://14d-1.itrcweb.org/remediation-and-treatment-technologies/ 15. 1,4-Dioxane Limits for Household Cleansing, Personal Care, and Cosmetic Products - Department of Environmental Conservation - NY.Gov, https://dec.ny.gov/environmental-protection/help-for-businesses/household-personal-cosmetic-dioxane-limits 16. DEC Finalizes Regulations Restricting 1,4-Dioxane in Consumer Products - NYSDEC, https://dec.ny.gov/news/press-releases/2024/9/dec-finalizes-regulations-restricting-14-dioxane-in-consumer-products 17. North Americans Now Getting Less Exposure to Hidden Carcinogen 1,4-Dioxane after New York Law Creates Industry-Wide Change - Citizens Campaign for the Environment, https://www.citizenscampaign.org/whats-new-at-cce/2024/2/20/north-americans-now-getting-less-exposure-to-hidden-carcinogen-14-dioxane-after-new-york-law-creates-industry-wide-change 18. 1-4-dioxane - Citizens Campaign for the Environment, https://www.citizenscampaign.org/14dioxane 19. Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane | US EPA, https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation-14-dioxane 20. Final Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane | US EPA, https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/final-risk-evaluation-14-dioxane 21. Isothiazolinone White Paper - ChemView, https://chemview.epa.gov/chemview/proxy?filename=8EHQ-18-21337_06.22.2018_Combined.pdf 22. Amended Safety Assessment of Methylisothiazolinone as Used in Cosmetics - CIR Report Data Sheet, https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/MI092020FAR.pdf 23. Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Methylisothiazolinone - epa nepis, https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P1009GN3.TXT 24. hazard characterization of isothiazolinones in support of fifra registration review - Regulations.gov, https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0159-0008/content.pdf 25. Surfactant Parameter Effect on Cleaning Efficiency - P2 InfoHouse, https://p2infohouse.org/ref/39/38838.pdf 26. Gut epithelial barrier damage caused by dishwasher detergents and rinse aids - PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36464527/ 27. Residue from detergents left on dishes could harm gut health - New Atlas, https://newatlas.com/health-wellbeing/chemical-detergents-washing-dishes-harm-gut-health/ 28. Is Soap Residue Harmful? Why Human-Safe Ingredients Matter - Branch Basics, https://branchbasics.com/blogs/cleaning/kitchen-sink-smells-bad 29. Dishwasher Detergent and Rinse Aid Safety | The American Cleaning Institute (ACI), https://www.cleaninginstitute.org/dishwasher-detergent-and-rinse-aid-safety 30. Why You Should Stop Mixing Baking Soda and Vinegar To Clean, According to a Scientist, https://www.simplyrecipes.com/stop-mixing-baking-soda-and-vinegar-scientist-8750981 31. Baking Soda and Vinegar - Myth vs Reality - Meticulous Man Services, https://meticulousmanservices.com/baking-soda-and-vinegar-cleaning-myths/ 32. The One Cleaning Product You Shouldn't Combine With Vinegar - House Digest, https://www.housedigest.com/1377446/clean-dont-combine-vinegar-castille-soap/ 33. Dish Soap - Free & Clear - Seventh Generation, https://www.seventhgeneration.com/dish-liquid-free-clear-19-fl-oz 34. Better Life what-EVER! Natural All-Purpose Cleaner, Unscented - EWG, https://www.ewg.org/cleaners/products/5802-BetterLifewhatEVERNaturalAllPurposeCleanerUnscented/ 35. Better Life DISH IT OUT Natural Dish Liquid, Unscented Cleaner Rating - EWG, https://www.ewg.org/cleaners/products/5580-BetterLifeDISHITOUTNaturalDishLiquidUnscented/ 36. Ecover Zero Dish Soap, Fragrance Free Cleaner Rating - EWG's Guide to Healthy Cleaning, https://www.ewg.org/cleaners/products/6358-EcoverZeroDishSoapFragranceFree/ 37. Ecover Sensitive Zero Washing-up Liquid ingredients (Explained) - INCIDecoder, https://incidecoder.com/products/ecover-sensitive-zero-washing-up-liquid 38. P&G Dawn Dish Soap, https://web1.co.ottertail.mn.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=150716&dbid=0&repo=Otter-Tail
