🔥 The Great 2025 Myth-Busting Bonanza: Our Humorous Guide to Ditching the Year's Top BS!

 Introduction: A Hundred Myths, Zero Bullshit

In 2025, the digital world is a dazzling but chaotic place, a relentless firehose of information where truth and fabrication mingle in a confusing, algorithm-driven dance. The volume of nonsense can feel overwhelming, and the demand for a definitive guide to "debunking the top 100 bullshit myths" is entirely understandable. A simple list, however, would be a disservice. It would be like trying to fight a wildfire with a squirt gun. Instead, this report will take a different approach. It will not just catalog falsehoods, but it will also delve into the deeper social, psychological, and technological currents that allow these myths to thrive. The goal is to equip a savvy and skeptical audience with a new set of mental tools, transforming the passive act of fact-checking into the active practice of critical thinking. So, let the great myth-busting bonanza begin!

II. Section 1: The Wellness Witch Hunt 🧙♀️ Health & Nutrition Myths That Just Won't Die

In the modern landscape of health and wellness, a persistent battle rages between evidence-based science and viral, anecdotal trends. The year 2025 has seen a new wave of old-school health myths, repackaged and amplified by social media platforms, as well as the creation of entirely new, and often dangerous, fads.

Subsection: TikTok's Troubling "Cures" & Other Fads

The internet’s newest self-proclaimed medical marvel is the "McMigraine". This viral TikTok trend suggests that a large Coca-Cola and a side of McDonald’s fries can cure a splitting headache. The theory behind this hack is that the combination of sodium, sugar, caffeine, and simple carbohydrates offers fast-acting symptom relief. For some, a brief sense of comfort may occur, a phenomenon that can be attributed to the temporary rush of dopamine from the salt and sugar, combined with the blood-vessel-constricting effects of caffeine. This temporary comfort, however, is often mistaken for a genuine cure, allowing the myth to flourish.

The reality, as detailed by medical experts, is far more concerning. A single "McMigraine" order contains 100 grams of added sugar, which is double the daily recommended limit. It also contains 777 milligrams of sodium, nearly one-third of the daily advised maximum, and 9.5 grams of saturated fat, almost half of the suggested daily intake. This highly processed combination can lead to long-term health risks, including inflammation, and could even worsen chronic migraine symptoms over time. The McMigraine myth is an example of an anecdote being mistaken for a medically sound solution. This pattern reflects a broader societal trend: a growing distrust in traditional medical institutions is causing individuals to turn to unproven and often dangerous sources for health advice. This is exacerbated by a business model where dietary and supplement industries pay influencers to promote unproven remedies, monetizing a skeptical public's search for easy answers and turning health misinformation into a lucrative industry.

Beyond the McMigraine, 2025 has witnessed the spread of other perilous DIY wellness trends. These include filing teeth for a perfectly aligned smile or using rubber bands as a makeshift orthodontic solution, both of which can cause permanent enamel damage and compromise dental structure. The list of popular but unproven fads continues with claims about the benefits of colostrum, okra water, and borax water. The widespread promotion of such "miracle cures" on platforms like TikTok highlights how health misinformation is not accidental but is often deliberately engineered to exploit and monetize public doubt.

Subsection: Old Wives' Tales on Life Support

Some myths are so ingrained in the collective consciousness that they feel like immutable truths. However, a closer look reveals that many of the stories passed down through generations are, in fact, entirely false.

One of the most enduring digestive myths is that chewing gum stays in your stomach for five to seven years. In reality, most gum is not digestible and simply travels through the system in a matter of two to four days. Similarly, the parental warning to wait an hour after eating before swimming to prevent cramping is a misconception. A normal-sized meal will not cause cramps, although overeating may make a person feel tired or fatigued.

The popular claim that humans only use 10% of their brain is a motivational speaker's ploy that dates back to the early 1900s. Brain activity studies have provided no evidence to support this notion, showing instead that nearly all parts of the brain are active throughout a variety of activities. Another common physiological myth is that cracking your knuckles causes arthritis. A 30-year study debunked this idea, though it did find that the practice can lessen a person's grip strength due to repeated overstretching of the tendons.

Weather-related myths also persist. It is a misconception that going outside with wet hair on a cold day will cause you to catch a cold. Colds are caused by viruses, not by temperature. The feeling of being unwell after spending a long time in the cold is merely the body experiencing symptoms similar to a virus, such as chills and fatigue, but without the viral agent. Lastly, the cosmetic myth that shaved hair grows back thicker and darker is also unfounded. The new hair appears darker because it has not yet been bleached by the sun, and the blunt tip from the razor makes it feel coarser and appear thicker than an unshaved strand with a tapered end.

Subsection: The Great Seed Oil Saga: A Nutrition Showdown

The modern wellness world has produced a pervasive myth that seed oils are toxic, inflammatory, and the root cause of chronic diseases like cancer, diabetes, and heart disease. This narrative, which often demonizes a group of oils known as the "hateful eight" (including canola, corn, and soy oil), has gained significant traction on social media and in political discourse. The myth’s origins can be traced to figures like biologist Ray Peat, and it has been popularized by modern influencers and political personalities. The misinformation spreads through podcasts and social media, often intertwined with broader conspiratorial ideas.

However, the scientific consensus presents a starkly different picture. Studies from leading institutions like Harvard and Johns Hopkins show that seed oils are not only safe for consumption but are also beneficial for health. Research consistently demonstrates that a higher intake of linoleic acid, a key polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) in seed oils, is associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular events and type 2 diabetes. The belief that these oils increase inflammation is not supported by data from recent clinical trials.

The power of this misinformation lies in a sophisticated conflation of two different truths. The anti-seed oil narrative correctly identifies that ultra-processed junk foods are unhealthy. However, it then incorrectly assigns the blame for that unhealthiness to a single ingredient—the seed oils used in their production. This subtle but powerful sleight of hand leverages a legitimate health concern (the negative effects of junk food) to promote a baseless one (the toxicity of seed oils). This is a crucial strategy of modern misinformation: a "plausible-sounding" falsehood that uses a well-accepted fact as a Trojan horse for an unproven claim. By understanding this tactic, a person can better identify similar narratives in other contexts.

The following table provides a clear breakdown of the seed oil narrative, illustrating the distinction between the myth, the reality, and the reasons for its persistence.

III. Section 2: The Digital Wild West 🤖 AI, Scams, & Social Media Misinformation

The digital frontier of 2025 is a complex landscape where technology is both a source of unprecedented access to information and a new vector for deception. The lines between what is real and what is fabricated have blurred, creating a fertile ground for a new generation of myths and hoaxes.

Subsection: AI Isn't Human (Yet): What's Hype, What's Fact

The most significant technological myth of 2025 is the belief that AI is intelligent, sentient, and capable of human-like creativity. This science-fiction fantasy, while compelling, is not supported by current technology. Large Language Models (LLMs) operate on complex, data-powered algorithms, not consciousness or feeling. They mimic human conversation by processing vast datasets and generating responses based on predictive probability—a process that has been aptly described as "just math". When an AI seems to understand or empathize, it is because its algorithms have been trained on human-created data to produce responses that a person would likely say in a given situation. The outputs are predictive, not original, meaning that AI will not produce completely new ideas; it will only generate content based on what already exists.

However, this myth exists alongside a serious and emerging ethical debate. While current AI systems are not conscious, some experts, including co-founders of OpenAI and researchers at MIT, believe that future superintelligent systems could potentially be sentient. This possibility has led to a new "moral frontier" where society may have to decide how to treat digital minds that claim to have feelings. The debate could create "huge social ruptures" as one segment of society argues for AI rights while another views the idea as a delusion. In response, organizations like UNESCO have established ethical guidelines to ensure human rights and dignity remain paramount as AI technology advances.

Paradoxically, the most pressing issue with AI in 2025 is not its sentience, but its role in amplifying misinformation. The year's data reveals a striking "structural tradeoff": as chatbots have been programmed to pull from real-time web searches to be more responsive, they have inadvertently become more susceptible to spreading falsehoods. This has caused the rate of AI tools repeating false claims to nearly double in one year, reaching 35% in August 2025. The AI models now treat unreliable sources as credible, pulling from a "polluted online information ecosystem" and "laundering" propaganda from malign actors. This creates a self-inflicted wound for the information age, where AI is used to generate fake content, which is then ingested by other AI, making the entire system less reliable.

Subsection: The New Rules of the Scam Game

The sophistication of online scams has reached a new level in 2025, driven by the accessibility of generative AI. The technology is being used to enhance traditional fraud, making it more convincing and difficult to detect. For example, scammers are leveraging AI to create deepfake videos and voices, impersonating loved ones or corporate executives. This was demonstrated in a high-profile case where a finance clerk in Hong Kong was defrauded of over $25 million after being convinced to authorize large fund transfers by deepfake executives in a video call.

Another pervasive and financially devastating trend is the use of AI in "pig butchering" romance scams. AI tools allow fraudsters to manage thousands of conversations simultaneously, building deep emotional connections with victims before convincing them to invest large sums of money in fraudulent schemes. Additionally, AI is used to write more convincing and natural-sounding phishing emails and smishing texts, and to mimic accents for phone-based scams.

This data reveals a direct and causal link between the spread of misinformation and real-world financial crime. The IRS's 2025 "Dirty Dozen" list of tax scams highlights this connection, noting that many schemes, such as bogus self-employment tax credits and overstated withholding scams, are fueled by bad advice circulating on social media. This confirms that online misinformation is not merely a cultural annoyance; it is a serious criminal vector that can lead directly to tax problems, identity theft, and financial loss.

Subsection: Social Media's Fake Reality: Debunking the Influencer Dream

In the realm of social media, several core myths persist despite evidence to the contrary. One of the most prominent is the belief that a large follower count equates to success. While a high number of followers can be impressive, the true measure of a brand's health and influence is engagement—the number of likes, shares, and comments that a post receives. A massive following with little engagement is a "vanity metric" that does not translate to business growth.

Other common misconceptions include the idea that social media is only for young audiences. In reality, platforms like Facebook and LinkedIn are still highly popular among older demographics, and Gen Z is increasingly seeking out screen-free alternatives. A related myth is that a brand needs to be on every social media platform to succeed. This approach often dilutes efforts and weakens a brand's message. A more strategic and effective approach is to focus on the platforms where the target audience is most active and where content will perform best.

A fascinating study from 2025 sheds light on a unique psychological bias that fuels misinformation: fake news spreads more quickly on social media when it is about the future. This suggests a deep-seated human need for narratives that provide an explanation or prediction for an uncertain world. Misinformation about future events, such as a fictional riot or a bogus celebrity protest payment, taps into our fears and hopes more powerfully than a verifiable story about the past. This is a critical nuance of modern misinformation: it's not simply about getting facts wrong, but about providing a narrative that confirms a person’s preconceived worldview, which is often a more powerful motivator than a simple truth.

IV. Section 3: History's Biggest Goofs & The Stories We Tell 📜

The human mind loves a good story, and often, a convenient or dramatic one will supplant a more mundane truth. This phenomenon is particularly prevalent in the retelling of history, where myths are often born from a misunderstanding or deliberately fabricated for political or artistic purposes.

Subsection: From Wooden Teeth to Horned Helmets

Perhaps no historical myth is more deeply ingrained than the notion that George Washington had wooden teeth. This is entirely false. His dentures were made from a disturbing variety of materials, including ivory, lead, gold, and human and animal teeth. In fact, when he took the oath of office, he had only one original tooth left. The "wooden" appearance of his dental fittings was likely due to the staining of the ivory and other materials over time, which gave them a wood-like grain and color that misled later observers.

Other historical falsehoods are equally popular. The image of Vikings wearing horned helmets is a pure invention of 19th-century artists and theatrical costumers who were seeking a more dramatic and "barbaric" visual. In reality, archaeological evidence shows that Viking helmets were practical and hornless. Similarly, the myth that Napoleon Bonaparte was a temperamental and extremely short military leader is largely a product of British propaganda during the Napoleonic Wars. In reality, he stood at 5 feet 6 inches (1.70 m), which was average or even slightly above average for a French man of his time. Finally, the myth that Albert Einstein was a lousy student who failed math is a misconception. While he did fail an entrance exam to the Zurich Polytechnic Institute on his first attempt, it was due to a lack of fluency in French, not a deficiency in math, which he passed.

Subsection: The "Great Wall from Space" and Other Global Tall Tales

Modern myths are often born from a desire to highlight or romanticize a culture's heritage. The claim that the Great Wall of China is visible from space is one such falsehood. Despite its length, the wall blends with the landscape and is not visible to the naked eye from low orbit, according to astronauts who have confirmed this fact.

Another enduring misconception is that ancient Romans used "vomitoriums" for purging food during feasts so they could continue eating. This is a mistranslation. A vomitorium was a passageway in a stadium or amphitheater that allowed a large crowd of people to "spew forth," or exit quickly at the end of an event. The word's shared Latin root with "vomit" is the source of the confusion, but there is no functional link.

In a more somber context, there is a pervasive myth about the Salem Witch Trials. Contrary to popular belief, those convicted of witchcraft in Salem were hanged, not burned at the stake. This myth likely originated from a confusion with the witch hunts that were common in Europe during the same period, where burning was a more typical method of execution. Finally, a common myth about Christopher Columbus is that he sailed to prove the Earth was round. In fact, educated Europeans had known that the Earth was round for centuries, a fact derived from ancient Greek scholarship. Columbus’s true gamble was not the Earth's shape, but the unknown size of the oceans.

The following table serves as a quick reference, summarizing some of history's most compelling and widely believed falsehoods.

V. The Myth-Buster's Toolkit: How to Spot BS on Your Own

Debunking specific myths is a necessary and often humorous task, but it is not a sufficient solution in a world where misinformation is constantly evolving. The antidote to new falsehoods is a well-developed framework for critical thinking. The following section provides a few simple but powerful tools to help a person become their own fact-checker.

Check the Source, Not Just the Headline. 🕵️♀️ A crucial first step is to look beyond the title and examine where the information is coming from. A person should ask: Is the information from a reputable organization with a history of journalistic or scientific integrity, or is it from a random account on social media or an unverified website? The credentials of the author and the reputation of the source are often the most reliable indicators of its credibility.

Evidence Over Anecdote. 🔬 The modern digital landscape is dominated by personal stories and emotional appeals. A person's account of how the "McMigraine" fixed their headache is compelling but is not a substitute for peer-reviewed studies and scientific consensus. Personal anecdotes are powerful but should never be the sole basis for a health or financial decision.

Look for Sensationalism. 📢 Misinformation is often designed to provoke a strong emotional reaction. A person should be wary of any claims that use sensational language or phrases like "miracle cure," "secret remedy," "guaranteed results," or "wake up to this one weird trick." These are classic red flags that the information is more interested in generating clicks than in conveying truth.

Cross-Reference Your Reality. 🌐 If a claim seems too good to be true, it likely is. The best way to verify a piece of information is to cross-reference it against multiple, diverse, and credible sources. If a claim contradicts widely accepted scientific or historical consensus and cannot be verified by other reputable outlets, it is likely unreliable.

VI. Conclusion: Staying Sane in the Information Age

The year 2025 has demonstrated that misinformation is a sophisticated and pervasive threat, constantly adapting to new technologies and exploiting timeless human biases. The myths of today are not just simple falsehoods; they are often engineered narratives that conflate two truths, prey on public distrust, or leverage psychological vulnerabilities. They can range from harmless historical goofs to dangerous health fads and financially devastating scams. The antidote, however, is not a simple list of facts to memorize, but a shared commitment to a different way of thinking. The tools of critical inquiry—skepticism, curiosity, and a willingness to question the sensational—are the most powerful defense against a world awash in nonsense. The ultimate goal is to empower a new generation of digital citizens to not just consume information, but to actively and wisely navigate the complex currents of the information age.

Works cited

1. Can McDonald's Cure Your Migraine? Debunking the Viral ..., https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-student-contributors-health-and-nutrition/can-mcdonalds-cure-your-migraine-debunking-viral-mcmigraine-trend 2. The McDonald's McMigraine Hack Is the Latest TikTok Fail, But These Healthy Methods May Bring Relief | VegNews, https://vegnews.com/mcdonalds-migraine-tiktok-fail 3. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Launches Online Hub to Counter Misinformation about Nutrition, https://www.eatrightpro.org/about-us/for-media/press-releases/academy-launches-online-hub-to-counter-misinformation-about-nutrition 4. POV: Health Misinformation Is Rampant on Social Media | BU Today | Boston University, https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/health-misinformation-rampant-on-social-media/ 5. Debunking Viral Dental Care Trends: Why DIY Can Be Dangerous - Smiles for Centreville, https://www.smilesforcentreville.com/2025/01/27/debunking-viral-dental-care-trends-why-diy-can-be-dangerous/ 6. 14 health and wellness fads to avoid - ZOE, https://zoe.com/learn/health-and-wellness-fads-to-avoid 7. 10 myths you may have heard from your parents - UCHealth Today, https://www.uchealth.org/today/10-myths-you-may-have-heard-from-your-parents/ 8. Medical Myths Debunked: The Truth Behind 18 Common Health Misconceptions, https://valleywisehealth.org/blog/medical-myths-debunked-truth-behind-common-health-misconceptions/ 9. 10 Most Popular Debunked Learning Myths in 2024 - Global Services In Education, https://www.gsineducation.com/blog/10-most-popular-debunked-learning-myths-in-2024 10. 25 Nutrition Myths That Need to Die in 2025 — IMAGO NUTRITION, https://www.imagonutrition.com/articles/nutrition-myths-that-need-to-die 11. Seed oil misinformation - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed_oil_misinformation 12. Fact-Check: Paul Saladino on seed oils - The Proof, https://theproof.com/fact-check-paul-saladino-on-seed-oils/ 13. The Unscientific Crusade Against Seed Oils - McGill University, https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/medical-critical-thinking-health-and-nutrition/unscientific-crusade-against-seed-oils 14. Ray Peat Diet: Everything You Should Know, https://www.theprimal.com/blog/ray-peat-diet 15. Seed Oils Friend or Foe? Part 2 diet - Grassland Beauty, https://grasslandbeauty.com/blogs/news/seed-oils-friend-or-foe-part-2 16. The Evidence Behind Seed Oils' Health Effects | Johns Hopkins, https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/the-evidence-behind-seed-oils-health-effects 17. Debunking 11 Common AI Myths in 2025 - Upwork, https://www.upwork.com/resources/artificial-intelligence-myths 18. What is Conversational AI? | IBM, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/conversational-ai 19. AI Ethics: What Duties Do We Owe a Sentient Digital Mind?, https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/ai-ethics-what-duties-do-we-owe-a-sentient-digital-mind 20. Viewpoint: AI and consciousness—How we will ethically interact with robots as they develop the 'intelligence' to show feelings - Genetic Literacy Project, https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2025/08/12/viewpoint-ai-and-consciousness-how-we-will-ethically-interact-with-robots-as-they-develop-the-intelligence-to-show-feelings/ 21. Will AI ever be conscious? - Clare College, https://stories.clare.cam.ac.uk/will-ai-ever-be-conscious/index.html 22. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence | UNESCO, https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics 23. August 2025 — AI False Claim Monitor - NewsGuard, https://www.newsguardtech.com/ai-monitor/august-2025-ai-false-claim-monitor/ 24. The Latest Scams You Need to Be Aware of in 2025 - Experian, https://www.experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/the-latest-scams-you-need-to-aware-of/ 25. The 6 Most Popular AI Scams In 2025 - CanIPhish, https://caniphish.com/blog/ai-scams 26. Dirty Dozen tax scams for 2025: IRS warns taxpayers to watch out for dangerous threats, https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/dirty-dozen-tax-scams-for-2025-irs-warns-taxpayers-to-watch-out-for-dangerous-threats 27. Debunking Social Media Myths: What You Need to Know for 2025 - Flourish, https://www.flourishconsultingservices.com/uncategorized/debunking-social-media-myths-what-you-need-to-know-for-2025/ 28. Debunking 3 Common Gen Z Marketing Myths - SiriusXM Media, https://www.siriusxmmedia.com/insights/debunking-3-common-gen-z-marketing-myths 29. Fake news spreads further on X if the story is about the future - Trinity College Dublin, https://www.tcd.ie/news_events/articles/2025/fake-news-spreads-further-on-x-if-the-story-is-about-the-future/ 30. Myths Debunked: 5 Widely Believed Tales about Historical Figures, https://blog.gale.com/myths-debunked-5-widely-believed-tales-about-historical-figures/ 31. List of common misconceptions about history - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions_about_history 32. www.nlm.nih.gov, https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/georgewashington/education/onlineactivities00.html#:~:text=1790%E2%80%931799-,Courtesy%20Mount%20Vernon%20Ladies'%20Association,ivory%2C%20animal%20and%20human%20teeth. 33. Dentally Unready: Gen. George Washington's Lifetime of Dental Misery | Health.mil, https://www.health.mil/News/Articles/2022/02/03/Dentally-Unready-Gen-George-Washingtons-Lifetime-of-Dental-Misery 34. Did George Washington Really Have Wooden Teeth? - Family Dentistry of Bellevue, https://www.familydentistryofbellevue.com/blog/did-george-washington-really-have-wooden-teeth/ 35. www.mountvernon.org, https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/wooden-teeth-myth#:~:text=The%20origin%20of%20this%20myth,appearance%20that%20misled%20later%20observers. 36. 15 Historical Myths That Were Deliberately Fabricated - History Collection, https://historycollection.com/15-historical-myths-that-were-deliberately-fabricated/